
I regularly meet other entrepreneurs at startup community events such as Startup Village, which is a once a month event where a handful of companies pitch their business to a crowd of around 200 people.
Lately, several entrepreneurs that I have met with have all pitched me their business concept that falls into the category of a two-sided market, which naturally creates the classic chicken & egg problem. Usually this involves some form of an aggregator or marketplace product where buyers of a particular industry have easier or discounted access to multiple suppliers in that industry. The typical business model involves a transaction fee or revenue share when the buyer makes a purchase through the marketplace product.
The problem is that this model requires double the work for a startup! First you have to partner with enough suppliers so that the marketplace is attractive to buyers and then you have to attract enough buyers to make the marketplace viable to the suppliers and to earn sustainable revenue for your business.
Based on my own personal experience at Cooleaf with our first product, I discovered a full set of challenges with this model. A big challenge that I found was the amount of time spent on maintaining the supplier side of the marketplace. Issues such as keeping data or supplier information current, suppliers not being happy with the amount of business they are receiving, turnover at the supplier and them forgetting they even have an agreement in place, growing the number of suppliers into new markets which will make people question the scalability of your model (big issue for investors), and more.
An issue on the buyer side is that you need a enough budget to put behind promoting your marketplace to change the behavior of a large number of buyers. I get feedback from entrepreneurs that they are going to leverage social media to do this. My response, good luck with that! Getting likes on Facebook is a far road from getting loyal customers.
Another issue with buyers is them going directly to the supplier once they establish the relationship and cut your marketplace out. I’ve found buyers in this model to have very little loyalty to the marketplace product and more often than not, it comes down to price which is a ‘race to the bottom’ business.
My suggestion when I meet entrepreneurs who are going down this road is to focus on building the technology to solve the problem that they see for buyers in the market, but just sell it directly to suppliers as a product. This may be branded for the supplier and licensed to them which creates a recurring revenue business model (investors love this!). This allows the entrepreneur to focus on building a product company as opposed to a marketing company. I think it’s really hard to be great at both. Plus, by just focusing on building and selling to the suppliers in the market, you are able to dedicate all your scares resources and attention. I believe this is critical for any startup to be successful.