The Entrepreneur Mind – my interview with Kevin Johnson

Kevin and team

I recently read the book, The Entrepreneur Mind. The book is made up of 100 short stories of lessons learned by Kevin Johnson’s experience starting multiple companies, being an investor, and an entrepreneur. One of the chapters in the book is focused on People, which of course is of interest to me because of the focus that my company, Cooleaf has on building strong company cultures.

I decided to send a tweet to Kevin since he is local to Atlanta to see if he would be willing to meet. The cool thing was that within minutes he responded and was Tweet to Kevinopen to doing an interview. Here is a short summary of the interview I did with Kevin.

“People make the world go round. It’s all about people and relationships. Entrepreneurs who are most comfortable working with people will be most successful.”

Lesson #42 – Talent trumps seniority

In the book, Kevin shares a story about being a young developer for a company where there was what he called a ‘seniority complex’. In the story, his manager gave him a project to complete that had been dragging along for months in the company. Kevin spent the weekend knocking it out and presented the completed work the next Monday. Kevin was shocked to see his manager being yelled at for getting the project completed. Basically, by Kevin getting the work done so quickly, it made others look bad, especially since he was so young and a junior employee.

Effective organizations learn to remove the seniority complex and focus on performance above all else.

Lesson #44- People do not work for money

 

One of the stories Kevin wrote about in his book is how he hired people at high salaries for his first company. He found later that interns were just as productive and were willing to work for free. Why? Because they wanted the prestige of writing for a cool magazine (he published a college magazine for his first company). Kevin realized that people were willing to work for something they were truly passionate about.

I asked Kevin how you find people who have that internal passion and are willing to invest into your company. He said to always go with your gut but to also have as many people interview the person as possible. Also let the candidate you are interviewing come in and meet anyone from your company they would like to speak with to get the best understanding of your company’s culture.

Lesson #50 – Fire unproductive people

Making the hard decisions separates true leaders from the rest. I’ve personally experienced how hard it can be to let someone go that you know are not the right fit. In Kevin’s book he emphasizes that productive entrepreneurs are those who are decisive. He says that many entrepreneurs know the right decision but put it off for months before finally making the tough call. This lowers productivity and with a small organization, can be a drain on the entire culture.

When I interviewed Kevin about this point, he mentioned two ideas to think about when making tough decisions.

 

1. For those who have kids, you can be nice until you think about how the unproductive person who you are delaying letting go is getting in the way of your kid’s college fund. This will get you motivated to make some decisions when you make it personal. Regardless, it should be personal. After all, it’s your company.

2. One way to soften the blow for the employee being let go is to help them find a new role afterwards. Kevin says that if you kick someone in the teeth, at least you can help them find a dentist.

The Entrepreneur Mind

Challenges of a Two-Sided Market Business

chicken-or-egg

I regularly meet other entrepreneurs at startup community events such as Startup Village, which is a once a month event where a handful of companies pitch their business to a crowd of around 200 people.

Lately, several entrepreneurs that I have met with have all pitched me their business concept that falls into the category of a two-sided market, which naturally creates the classic chicken & egg problem. Usually this involves some form of an aggregator or marketplace product where buyers of a particular industry have easier or discounted access to multiple suppliers in that industry. The typical business model involves a transaction fee or revenue share when the buyer makes a purchase through the marketplace product.

The problem is that this model requires double the work for a startup! First you have to partner with enough suppliers so that the marketplace is attractive to buyers and then you have to attract enough buyers to make the marketplace viable to the suppliers and to earn sustainable revenue for your business.

Based on my own personal experience at Cooleaf with our first product, I discovered a full set of challenges with this model.  A big challenge that I found was the amount of time spent on maintaining the supplier side of the marketplace. Issues such as keeping data or supplier information current, suppliers not being happy with the amount of business they are receiving, turnover at the supplier and them forgetting they even have an agreement in place, growing the number of suppliers into new markets which will make people question the scalability of your model (big issue for investors), and more.

An issue on the buyer side is that you need a enough budget to put behind promoting your marketplace to change the behavior of a large number of buyers. I get feedback from entrepreneurs that they are going to leverage social media to do this. My response, good luck with that! Getting likes on Facebook is a far road from getting loyal customers.

Another issue with buyers is them going directly to the supplier once they establish the relationship and cut your marketplace out. I’ve found buyers in this model to have very little loyalty to the marketplace product and more often than not, it comes down to price which is a ‘race to the bottom’ business.

My suggestion when I meet entrepreneurs who are going down this road is to focus on building the technology to solve the problem that they see for buyers in the market, but just sell it directly to suppliers as a product. This may be branded for the supplier and licensed to them which creates a recurring revenue business model (investors love this!). This allows the entrepreneur to focus on building a product company as opposed to a marketing company. I think it’s really hard to be great at both. Plus, by just focusing on building and selling to the suppliers in the market, you are able to dedicate all your scares resources and attention. I believe this is critical for any startup to be successful.